Prediction of Margaret Jessee vs Patricia Canning Todd Head-to-Head, At
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Jessee vs P. Canning Todd
Margaret Jessee
USA
w
l
w
l
w
w
l
l
w
l
1
Win
5
Played
4
Win
0
Age
103
-
Height
-
Ret.
C. Rank
Ret.
0
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-
Patricia Canning Todd
USA
l
w
l
w
l
w
w
w
w
l
1
Win
5
Played
4
Win
0
Age
103
-
Height
-
Ret.
C. Rank
Ret.
0
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Jessee 1 - 4 Todd
They have played 12 sets in total, with Margaret Jessee winning 4 and Patricia Canning Todd winning 8. The last match between Patricia Canning Todd and Margaret Jessee was at the California Interclub, 17-03-1946, Round: Robin, Surface: Hard, with Patricia Canning Todd getting the victory 6-3 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Jessee | 1 |
| Todd | 4 |
Last 6 H2H Matches:
(Robin) California Interclub(03-17-46)
Patricia Canning Todd
6
6
Margaret Jessee
3
2
(R4) Berkeley State(06-02-45)
Patricia Canning Todd
6
6
Margaret Jessee
3
4
(R2) US National Championships(08-30-41)
Patricia Canning Todd
6
10
Margaret Jessee
1
8
M. Jessee vs P. C. Todd H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 50.56% (45-44) | Career Total W/L | 73.07% (445-164) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 0 | Grass | 1 |
| 0 | Hard | 2 |
| 0 | Indoor | 1 |
| 0 | Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 4 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
M. Jessee vs P. C. Todd Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Margaret Jessee has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Patricia Canning Todd has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Margaret Jessee, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Patricia Canning Todd has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Margaret Jessee has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Patricia Canning Todd has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Margaret Jessee has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Patricia Canning Todd winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Margaret Jessee has their best career surface win % on N/A, winning 65% (W/L 15/8), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 31% (W/L 5/11). Patricia Canning Todd has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 81/25), and worse career win % on N/A, winning 67% (W/L 43/21).
- Player level: In the last year, Margaret Jessee has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Patricia Canning Todd has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 6 times before with Margaret Jessee winning 2 times and Patricia Canning Todd being victorious 4 times. They have played 12 sets in total, with Margaret Jessee winning 4 and Patricia Canning Todd winning 8.
- The last match between Margaret Jessee and Patricia Canning Todd was at the California Interclub, 17-03-1946, Round: Robin, Surface: Hard, with Patricia Canning Todd getting the victory 6-3 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Margaret Jessee has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Patricia Canning Todd has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Margaret Jessee has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Patricia Canning Todd has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Margaret Jessee has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Patricia Canning Todd has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Margaret Jessee vs Patricia Canning Todd Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Jessee vs P. C. Todd H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches Won | 4 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 8 |
| 48 | Games Won | 59 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 33% (2/6) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 67% (4/6) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (4/4) |
| 0% (0/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/4) |
| 0% (0/4) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/2) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Jessee 0%, Todd 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Jessee 0%, Todd 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Jessee 0%, Todd 0%.
M. Jessee Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Berkeley - 20-09-1954 | ||||
R3 Jean DoyleJ. Doyle | L | 6-4 6-2 | ||
| Berkeley - 17-09-1951 | ||||
R4 Joan NicholsonJ. Nicholson | W | 6-4 1-6 6-3 | ||
| Virginia WolfendenV. Wolfenden | L | 4-6 6-2 6-2 | ||
| Berkeley - 19-09-1949 | ||||
R3 Elizabeth LoeckE. Loeck | W | 6-3 6-0 | ||
R4 Shirley FryS. Fry | L | 9-7 3-0 RET | ||
P. C. Todd Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| La Costa - 10-09-1969 | ||||
R4 Valerie ZiegenfussV. Ziegenfuss | L | 6-4 12-10 | ||
| La Jolla Invitational - 02-03-1959 | ||||
SF Kathy ChabotK. Chabot | W | 6-4 4-6 6-4 | ||
F Karen SusmanK. Susman | W | 6-2 1-6 7-5 | ||
| Jacque TeglandJ. Tegland | W | 6-1 6-2 | ||
R4 Molly DanielsonM. Danielson | W | 6-1 6-1 | ||
M. Jessee vs P. C. Todd Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 50.56% (45/44) | YTD Win/Loss | 73.07% (445/164) |
| 51.40% (92/87) | Sets Win/Loss | 72.42% (914/348) |
| 51.51% (801/754) | Games Win/Loss | 61.70% (6669/4139) |
| 52.27% (23/21) | Hard Win/Loss | 69.35% (86/38) |
| 40.00% (2/3) | Clay Win/Loss | 76.42% (81/25) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 86.96% (20/3) |
| 31.25% (5/11) | Grass Win/Loss | 73.63% (215/77) |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 0.00% (0/2) | Slam W/L | 74.44% (67/23) |
| 49% (39/80) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 74% (429/576) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 21% (3/14) | Deciding Set Win % | 48% (48/99) |
| 87% (45/39) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 92% (443/407) |
| 11% (45/5) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 8% (443/34) |
| 3% (37/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (139/24) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
03:14 PM 16/11/25
Prediction
S. P. Contri
S. PalosiW1
2.22
W2
1.57
05:00 PM 16/11/25
Prediction
R. Tosetto
J. IngildsenW1
3.34
W2
1.27
11:30 PM 16/11/25
Prediction
C. Garin5
I. Buse7W1
1.66
W2
2.06
08:30 PM 16/11/25
Prediction
P. Alvarado
T. MartinezW1
2.31
W2
1.53
08:00 PM 16/11/25
PredictionC. Alcaraz
J. SinnerW1
2.46
W2
1.58
06:00 PM 16/11/25
Prediction
H. StewartL. BocchiW1
1.155
W2
4.5
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips
15 Nov 2025
Carlos Alcaraz vs Felix Auger Aliassime Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 15th November 2025 Best Bets
15 Nov 2025
Rebecca Sramkova vs Simona Waltert Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group C – 15th November 2025 Best Bets
15 Nov 2025
Maria Camila Osorio Serrano vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group D – 15th November 2025 Best Bets
15 Nov 2025
Prediction Of Auger-Aliassime Vs Minaur H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
15 Nov 2025
Prediction Of Alcaraz Vs Auger-Aliassime H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
15 Nov 2025
Prediction Of Sinner Vs Minaur H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
Top Predictions Today
Carlos AlcarazJannik Sinner20:00
H2H 10-5
Ella Seidel
Hanne VandewinkelH2H 0-0
Linda Noskova
Antonia RuzicH2H 0-0
Suzan Lamens
Sahaja Yamalapalli14:40
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Nitto ATP Finals - Turin
Italy
Bergamo Challenger
Italy
Champaign Challenger
United States
Drummondville Challenger
Canada
Florianopolis Challenger
Brazil
Guayaquil Challenger
Ecuador
Montemar Challenger
Spain
Montevideo Challenger
Uruguay
Soma Bay Challenger
Egypt
Sydney Challenger
Australia
Yokohama Challenger
Japan
M15 Alcala de Henares
Spain
M15 Azul
Argentina
M15 Bhubaneswar
India
M15 Criciuma
Brazil
M15 Gimcheon
Korea, Rep.
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Monastir
Tunisia
M15 Orlando
United States
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M25 Antalya
Turkey
M25 Cochabamba
Bolivia
M25 Columbus
United States
M25 Heraklion
Greece
M25 Luanda
Angola
M25 Manama
Bahrain
M25 Manzanillo
Mexico
M25 Vale do Lobo
Portugal